MSFN Forums: Worst OS Ever? - MSFN Forums

Jump to content


  • (2 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Worst OS Ever? New and Improved Poll for 2008

Poll: Let the OS Hate commence! (88 member(s) have cast votes)

Worst Microsoft OS Ever?

  1. DOS and/or Windows 3.11 (1 votes [1.14%])

    Percentage of vote: 1.14%

  2. Windows 95 (2 votes [2.27%])

    Percentage of vote: 2.27%

  3. Windows 98/98SE (4 votes [4.55%])

    Percentage of vote: 4.55%

  4. Windows ME (59 votes [67.05%])

    Percentage of vote: 67.05%

  5. Windows 2000 (1 votes [1.14%])

    Percentage of vote: 1.14%

  6. Windows XP Home Edition (2 votes [2.27%])

    Percentage of vote: 2.27%

  7. Windows XP Professional Edition (1 votes [1.14%])

    Percentage of vote: 1.14%

  8. Windows XP x64 Edition (5 votes [5.68%])

    Percentage of vote: 5.68%

  9. Windows Vista Home Basic Edition (5 votes [5.68%])

    Percentage of vote: 5.68%

  10. Windows Vista Home Premuim Edition (1 votes [1.14%])

    Percentage of vote: 1.14%

  11. Windows Vista Business/Enterprise Edition (1 votes [1.14%])

    Percentage of vote: 1.14%

  12. Windows Vista Ultimate Edition (4 votes [4.55%])

    Percentage of vote: 4.55%

  13. Windows Server 2003 (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  14. Windows Server 2008 (1 votes [1.14%])

    Percentage of vote: 1.14%

  15. Windows Seven (1 votes [1.14%])

    Percentage of vote: 1.14%

Worst Non-Microsoft OS Ever?

  1. Redhat Linux (2 votes [2.27%])

    Percentage of vote: 2.27%

  2. Slackware Linux (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  3. Gentoo Linux (2 votes [2.27%])

    Percentage of vote: 2.27%

  4. Debian Linux (2 votes [2.27%])

    Percentage of vote: 2.27%

  5. Ubuntu Linux (4 votes [4.55%])

    Percentage of vote: 4.55%

  6. Yellow Dog Linux (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  7. CentOS (3 votes [3.41%])

    Percentage of vote: 3.41%

  8. SUSE Linux (2 votes [2.27%])

    Percentage of vote: 2.27%

  9. Linspire/Lindows (5 votes [5.68%])

    Percentage of vote: 5.68%

  10. MAC OS 9 (8 votes [9.09%])

    Percentage of vote: 9.09%

  11. MAC OS X (7 votes [7.95%])

    Percentage of vote: 7.95%

  12. SunOS/Solaris (1 votes [1.14%])

    Percentage of vote: 1.14%

  13. Unix (1 votes [1.14%])

    Percentage of vote: 1.14%

  14. I don't use Non-Microsoft OSes (34 votes [38.64%])

    Percentage of vote: 38.64%

  15. There is no such thing as a Non-Microsoft OS. Its all a lie. A computer has to have Windows to run. (17 votes [19.32%])

    Percentage of vote: 19.32%

I run the Following OS(es) instead of the one above

  1. DOS and/or Windows 3.11 (5 votes [2.67%])

    Percentage of vote: 2.67%

  2. Windows 95 (4 votes [2.14%])

    Percentage of vote: 2.14%

  3. Windows 98/98SE (13 votes [6.95%])

    Percentage of vote: 6.95%

  4. Windows ME (4 votes [2.14%])

    Percentage of vote: 2.14%

  5. Windows 2000 (14 votes [7.49%])

    Percentage of vote: 7.49%

  6. Windows XP Home Edition (15 votes [8.02%])

    Percentage of vote: 8.02%

  7. Windows XP Professional Edition (57 votes [30.48%])

    Percentage of vote: 30.48%

  8. Windows XP x64 Edition (8 votes [4.28%])

    Percentage of vote: 4.28%

  9. Windows Vista Home Basic Edition (1 votes [0.53%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.53%

  10. Windows Vista Home Premuim Edition (7 votes [3.74%])

    Percentage of vote: 3.74%

  11. Windows Vista Business/Enterprise Edition (9 votes [4.81%])

    Percentage of vote: 4.81%

  12. Windows Vista Ultimate Edition (31 votes [16.58%])

    Percentage of vote: 16.58%

  13. Windows Server 2003 (11 votes [5.88%])

    Percentage of vote: 5.88%

  14. Windows Server 2008 (8 votes [4.28%])

    Percentage of vote: 4.28%

  15. Windows Seven (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 User is offline   PC_LOAD_LETTER 

  • Well, I stole something else
  • Icon
  • Group: Super Moderator
  • Posts: 1,827
  • Joined: 13-October 07
  • Gender:Male
  • OS:Windows 7 x86
  • Location:Oklahoma
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 24 June 2008 - 08:44 PM

I recently closed this poll because the discussion became less and less relevant with every post. Despite what you might think, I hate closing threads and told myself at the time if I closed it and I didn't get 100 PMs about closing the previous poll, I would make an updated one within a few days if no one else did. there are a few changes though the previous poll had separate votes for XP Home/Pro so i wanted to split Vista into separate choices because I personally think that XP Home and especially Vista Home Basic should have never existed but I love XP Pro/Vista Business and higher. Unfortunately, this meant combining Business and ENT Editions into the same category. Please do not ask for me to add any other OSes to the poll they simply will not fit. as this is the largest poll the MSFN board will allow.

All that said, please keep tthe discussion clean and keep Rule 7 in mind when posting:
Da Rules

Quote

7.a You are expected to be mature when discussing in threads. Racism, pornography, threatening, profanity, or excessive vulgarity is not tolerated. You will be promptly banned. No Exceptions.

7.b This community is built upon mutual respect. You are not allowed to flame other members. People who do not respect personal opinions and/or personal work will be warned in first instance. If you ignore the warning and keep on flaming, you will be banned without notice.


Ad Bot #1 User is online   Sponsor Icon

  • Advert Bot
  • Group: Ad Bots
  • Posts: 0
  • Joined: --

Warn Status

Warning level: 0%

0
  • +
  • -

#2 User is offline   okstatefan69 

  • Newbie
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 11
  • Joined: 27-January 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Pocola, OK

Posted 24 June 2008 - 08:52 PM

Hey Geek What part of the State are you from I'm from the same State (East Central Oklahoma)

#3 User is offline   Kelsenellenelvian 

  • WPI Guru
  • Icon
  • Group: Developers
  • Posts: 6,667
  • Joined: 18-September 03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Pocatello, ID

Posted 24 June 2008 - 08:55 PM

Lol I had to check nearly ALL of the bottom section....

#4 User is offline   PC_LOAD_LETTER 

  • Well, I stole something else
  • Icon
  • Group: Super Moderator
  • Posts: 1,827
  • Joined: 13-October 07
  • Gender:Male
  • OS:Windows 7 x86
  • Location:Oklahoma
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 24 June 2008 - 08:56 PM

I am from Tulsa, OK but somehow ended up in Warner, OK

View PostKelsenellenelvian, on Jun 24 2008, 09:55 PM, said:

Lol I had to check nearly ALL of the bottom section....

I'm cool until someone checks 'Windows Vista Home Basic Edition' in that section. No one should have to endure that mess (especially on the type of machine it usually ships on)

#5 User is offline   Thunderbolt 2864 

  • Trance & Hardstyle Fan
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 504
  • Joined: 28-December 05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Australia

Posted 24 June 2008 - 09:06 PM

Windows ME is the worst operating system Microsoft ever made. Its buggy, unstable... everything was bad about it. Why did they even bother releasing it while Windows 2000 was released in the same year.

#6 User is offline   leadboots5 

  • Junior
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 64
  • Joined: 13-May 07

Posted 24 June 2008 - 09:48 PM

View PostThunderbolt 2864, on Jun 24 2008, 10:06 PM, said:

Windows ME is the worst operating system Microsoft ever made. Its buggy, unstable... everything was bad about it. Why did they even bother releasing it while Windows 2000 was released in the same year.


I agree ME is baddd, they bothered to release it however as a "bridge" between the consumer and business if i'm not mistaken.

#7 User is offline   CoffeeFiend 

  • Coffee Aficionado
  • Icon
  • Group: Super Moderator
  • Posts: 3,900
  • Joined: 14-July 04
  • Location:Coffeeland

Posted 24 June 2008 - 09:58 PM

Another vote for WinME. 'nuff said!

#8 User is offline   Redhatcc 

  • Advanced Member
  • Icon
  • Group: Moderator
  • Posts: 349
  • Joined: 27-February 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Beach, South Carolina

Posted 02 July 2008 - 02:21 PM

lol i work at a used computer store and dealing with WinME weither it be setting up a dial-up connection, explaining why Time Warner highspeed wont work with their computer, software compatibility... list goes on...

one nice little saying i read is

Quote

. . . you might feel that the term Millennium refers to the length of time it will take to fix the glitches.


#9 User is offline   Jeremy 

  • MSFN Junkie
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,464
  • Joined: 24-June 04
  • Gender:Male

Posted 02 July 2008 - 02:29 PM

Isn't this topic getting a bit old?
Everyone knows the worst OS in Windows ME.
And for many the second worst is Windows Vista.

#10 User is offline   herbalist 

  • paranoid independent
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 507
  • Joined: 15-December 06
  • Gender:Male
  • OS:98
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 02 July 2008 - 04:25 PM

The top section should be a multiple choice. It depends too much on how you look at the question.
From a stability perspective, ME is definitely the worst. This is one OS that can crash or blue screen for no good reason at any time.
ME=Multiple Errors.
If one looks at exploitability, XP is the worst. It's bad enough that they had to make a regularly scheduled patch day for it. Hundreds of megabytes worth of patches later and there's no letup in the number of "critical vulnerabilities" being found. There's no end to the number of ways it can be compromised.
XP=eXtremely Patched.
For sheer bloat, resource wasting, unwanted, useless features, and taking control away from the user, it's Vista by far.
With MS operating systems, they've all got their unique problems. It's just a matter of which problems you can accept and work with. Given a choice between just the MS operating systems, I'll use 98lite, with several of the unofficial upgrades of course.
Rick

#11 User is offline   FAT64 

  • Senior Member
  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 655
  • Joined: 09-October 04
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Farnborough

Posted 02 July 2008 - 11:25 PM

ME (Mistake Edition). End of.

#12 User is offline   mitsukai 

  • Advanced Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 476
  • Joined: 07-January 07
  • Location:Breda

Posted 03 July 2008 - 03:26 AM

Actually... XP is the best ever, you need to know how to use it. Also nLite makes this OS far better than it already is. And the worst os for me is vista... why not me? well cus alot of users actually use this system, and its a new os from ms, thats why its 10x worse than me, if you buy a laptop, you may get vista and cant goto xp cus of drivers issues... also vista just seems XP with more crap in it... some features actually sound usefull and well designed but most is just bloated crap i dont need, and doesnt even work.. If you think XP is exploited alot, so is vista, or any other OS even tho the new "Security" features vista has.

Linux is good and all, it runs smooth, i like the way how you can download/install packages. But its not really supported, driver issues, not many games run on it... not sure if there is a msn/wlm client that u can use cam with in linux... that sort of stuff, Still i found some bugs in Ubuntu.

highly nLitened XP is far best os for my personal preferences, and i never ran in trouble with viruses or anything.

#13 User is offline   cluberti 

  • Gustatus similis pullus
  • Icon
  • Group: Supervisor
  • Posts: 9,125
  • Joined: 09-September 01
  • Gender:Male
  • OS:Windows 7 x64
  • Location:device attached to the internet

Posted 03 July 2008 - 06:19 AM

Well, you are free to your opinion - but it's just that. And statements like "bloated crap I don't need" and "doesn't work" seems to indicate that 1) you haven't run Vista (SP1) and are relying on heresay, 2) you ran it on an old machine and it didn't work properly, or 3) you like XP and Linux and anything designed after 2004 is "new and bloated". The Vista drivers for new machines issue is valid, but that has more to do with hardware vendors writing drivers for what they're shipping with the hardware, and not wanting to spend the money to rewrite the driver for XP.

#14 User is offline   CoffeeFiend 

  • Coffee Aficionado
  • Icon
  • Group: Super Moderator
  • Posts: 3,900
  • Joined: 14-July 04
  • Location:Coffeeland

Posted 03 July 2008 - 07:49 PM

View Postcluberti, on Jul 3 2008, 08:19 AM, said:

Well, you are free to your opinion - but it's just that. And statements like "bloated crap I don't need" and "doesn't work" seems to indicate that 1) you haven't run Vista (SP1) and are relying on heresay, 2) you ran it on an old machine and it didn't work properly, or 3) you like XP and Linux and anything designed after 2004 is "new and bloated".

I couldn't have said any better!

#15 User is offline   No6 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 108
  • Joined: 25-February 05

Posted 03 July 2008 - 08:27 PM

No mention of OS/2, BeOS, CP/M and several others?

The "ever" in the title may be superfluous.

#16 User is offline   Redhatcc 

  • Advanced Member
  • Icon
  • Group: Moderator
  • Posts: 349
  • Joined: 27-February 08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Beach, South Carolina

Posted 10 July 2008 - 10:35 PM

im heading back to Windows 95... c u guys later

#17 User is offline   Nerwin 

  • Geek.
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 1,819
  • Joined: 31-May 05
  • Gender:Male
  • OS:Windows 7 x86
  • Location:Waterbury, Vermont
  • Country: Country Flag

Posted 17 September 2008 - 10:47 PM

Well Windows ME is the worse ever :P I use Windows XP, Vista and Windows Server editions.

#18 User is offline   Sysdll 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 117
  • Joined: 22-December 07

Posted 27 February 2009 - 12:06 AM

OS 2 (any version) was the worst.

Second would be Vista. It does the same things I do with XP only slower and at a higher cost. Who wouldn't want that? :wacko:

#19 User is offline   RJM 

  • Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 222
  • Joined: 17-May 05
  • Location:Titusville, Florida

Posted 27 February 2009 - 10:26 AM

Rdos - Data General 1972 - 1980's

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RDOS

Showing my age.

This post has been edited by RJM: 27 February 2009 - 10:29 AM


#20 User is offline   cyberformer 

  • Junior
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 85
  • Joined: 16-September 05

Posted 27 February 2009 - 10:59 AM

Since I've put Norton Systemworks 2001 on Me, it is very stable!
So Me without those fix it up utilities, must be an altogether different animal.
Also, I still think that Me is the most asthetically beautiful---!

The worst OS from Windows would have to be Vista---when installed on machines that were known by those who installed it---to be machines inadequate for the task of running it properly!

I think that when put on a PC fully capable of running it---it can be good enough to be productive.

  • (2 Pages)
  • +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic


2 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users