Page 1 of 1
Fav car imports this ones for the fans of jap imports
#8
Posted 17 June 2003 - 11:36 AM
yeah yeah r34 am win.
but its over $120 grand new for a car that is only good in straight lines. and even then its only known for its high top end. plus its a coupe. i dont like coupes, unless they have Lamborghini written on them.
I was bored so heres some stats
Evo VII 2002
Engine: 4 cylinder, turbo charged 1997cc
BHP: 305 bhp at 6500 rpm
Torque: 300 lb-ft at 4500 rpm
0-60mph: 5.2secs
1/4 Mile(400m): 14.42 @ 92.7mph
Skyline R34 2001/2002
Engine: Twin-Turbo Inline-6 2568 cc
BHP: 276 bhp at 6800 rpm
Torque: 289 lb-ft at 4400 rpm
0-60mph: 5.1 sec
1/4 Mile(400m): 13.7 sec @ 105 mph
Toyota Supra 1996 and up
Engine:
BHP: 280 hp
Torque: 318 ft/lb
Turbine material: Ceramic (
to rufo)
0-60mph: 5.7 sec
1/4 Mile(400m) : 14.0 sec @ 100 mph
but its over $120 grand new for a car that is only good in straight lines. and even then its only known for its high top end. plus its a coupe. i dont like coupes, unless they have Lamborghini written on them.
I was bored so heres some stats
Evo VII 2002
Engine: 4 cylinder, turbo charged 1997cc
BHP: 305 bhp at 6500 rpm
Torque: 300 lb-ft at 4500 rpm
0-60mph: 5.2secs
1/4 Mile(400m): 14.42 @ 92.7mph
Skyline R34 2001/2002
Engine: Twin-Turbo Inline-6 2568 cc
BHP: 276 bhp at 6800 rpm
Torque: 289 lb-ft at 4400 rpm
0-60mph: 5.1 sec
1/4 Mile(400m): 13.7 sec @ 105 mph
Toyota Supra 1996 and up
Engine:
BHP: 280 hp
Torque: 318 ft/lb
Turbine material: Ceramic (
0-60mph: 5.7 sec
1/4 Mile(400m) : 14.0 sec @ 100 mph
#9
Posted 17 June 2003 - 05:35 PM
Quote
Toyota Supra 1996 and up
Engine:
BHP: 280 hp
Torque: 318 ft/lb
Turbine material: Ceramic ( to rufo)
0-60mph: 5.7 sec
1/4 Mile(400m) : 14.0 sec @ 100 mph
Engine:
BHP: 280 hp
Torque: 318 ft/lb
Turbine material: Ceramic ( to rufo)
0-60mph: 5.7 sec
1/4 Mile(400m) : 14.0 sec @ 100 mph
Quote
Evo VII 2002
Engine: 4 cylinder, turbo charged 1997cc
BHP: 305 bhp at 6500 rpm
Torque: 300 lb-ft at 4500 rpm
0-60mph: 5.2secs
1/4 Mile(400m): 14.42 @ 92.7mph
Engine: 4 cylinder, turbo charged 1997cc
BHP: 305 bhp at 6500 rpm
Torque: 300 lb-ft at 4500 rpm
0-60mph: 5.2secs
1/4 Mile(400m): 14.42 @ 92.7mph
The evo is quicker in acceleration, but over the quarter, the supra is quicker, and with less hp
#11
Posted 18 June 2003 - 03:13 AM
Rufo, on Jun 18 2003, 12:35 AM, said:
Quote
The evo is quicker in acceleration, but over the quarter, the supra is quicker, and with less hp 
Yeah. Look whos got the 3 litre engine
Those are stock figures by the way.
Basically mitsu have taken a lancer, tuned it to the sky and then badged it an Evo.
The supra and skyline are built specifically as sports cars.
The only mods that would give an evo bigger power is exhaust, as is with most cars, and a new air induction kit. and possibly some ecu mapping to get it running smoothly.
skylines and supras on the other hand can have so many mods its just not funny anymore. but its all up to personal preferance. happy dragging
omg who voted for the silvia? :doctor: come see Doc Al and get that seen too, its nasty!
Page 1 of 1

Sign In
Register
Help

MultiQuote



Report